Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371 --- Comment #32 from MartinKG <mgansser@xxxxxxxx> 2012-05-09 15:03:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Besides fedora packaging rules, are these rpm:s good enough to be exposed at > speed-dreams own website? What do you think? I think the rpms are good enough, but I will wait until 2.1 and all Fedora requirements are complied. By the way I have posted the spec file on http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=247525&page=3 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review