Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818454 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-09 08:06:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Ok, here is my point: I'm guessing that upstream just filled the license field > > in Readme wrongly, > > _Even so_, interpretting the whole license as GPLv2 is _no problem_, because > GPLv2+ and GPLv2 does not contradict. A bit more explanation. So the current license status is _no problem_, as currently there is no license incompatibility. If there is really license incompatibility, we MUST ask the upstream to fix it. however this is not the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review