Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817268 Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-09 01:57:05 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [!]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [!]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. (python-matplotlib is not an elf library) rpmlint python-faces-0.11.7-1.fc18.noarch.rpm python-faces.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint python-faces-0.11.7-1.fc18.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint python-faces-timescale-0.11.7-1.fc18.noarch.rpm python-faces-timescale.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/cheese/Public/817268/faces-pm-0.11.7.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : eea3cd8dc7f201ac6d745fe9d34274cd MD5SUM upstream package : eea3cd8dc7f201ac6d745fe9d34274cd [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [?]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [!]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Note: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/faces-project/faces- pm-%{version}.tar.gz (faces-pm-%{version}.tar.gz) Patch0: python-faces- openerp.patch (python-faces-openerp.patch) Patch1: python-faces- version.patch (python-faces-version.patch) Patch2: python-faces-fsf- fix.patch (python-faces-fsf-fix.patch) Patch3: python-faces- timescale.patch (python-faces-timescale.patch) [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. (Upstream comes no tests) [x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. Not requiring pygtk2. [!]: The 'git' macro is defined but not used [!]: I suggest the srpm be named 'faces-pm', and split into four rpms: - faces-pm "A project management tool based on Python" (the executable, and desktop entry file if you can provide) - python-faces "Python modules of Faces project management tool" - python-metapie "An application framework based on wxpython" (quoted from metapie/__init__.py) - python-faces-timescale "Timescale module for python-faces for Faces project management tool" [!] There is a special homepage for this project: http://faces.homeip.net/ [!] The urls for Patch0 and Patch3 are the same. [!] Patch0 is too heavy, actually cuts and relicenses the original file. I think the job can be done within OpenERP instead of patching faces/__init__.py. Since Faces-pm seems dead, it may be acceptable that OpenERP adopts some useful source files from Faces directly. [!]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. Every time of change should bump release number, even still under review. An empty is required between two changelog entries. [!]: SHOULD Package functions as described. I may not approve this package if the application doesn't run. Simply removing the executable is not responsible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review