Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311 --- Comment #6 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-07 22:09:18 EDT --- libircclient is now packaged, but still needs miniupnpc reviewed and built to enable packaging megaglest. I added an entry to the "miniupnpc Bugs" forum listing the patches and packaging problems as well as request for any comments on how it packaged, and a back link to the review request. See http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1140 rpmlint output: $ ls SRPMS/miniupnpc-1.6-3.fc16.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/miniupnpc-*.rpm RPMS/x86_64/miniupnpc-1.6-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm RPMS/x86_64/miniupnpc-debuginfo-1.6-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm RPMS/x86_64/miniupnpc-devel-1.6-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/miniupnpc-1.6-3.fc16.src.rpm $ rpmlint SRPMS/miniupnpc-1.6-3.fc16.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/miniupnpc-*.rpm miniupnpc-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libminiupnpc -> condominium 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The package was also verified in a mock --scratch build. Actually, there was a bug corrected in the new spec and srpm, caused by enabling the build to compile some test programs, but that was being done before actually generating the library, so now it does not run "make -j" but runs as "make upnpc-shared all" to build the library first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review