[Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xchat


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551


bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx      |caillon@xxxxxxxxxx
                 CC|                            |bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-03 16:20 EST -------
Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Group Tag is from the official list
* All paths begin with macros
* All directories are owned by this or other packages
* Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined

Must Fix:
* Package should have ownership of %{_libdir}/xchat

Minor:
* Not preferred buildroot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* Duplicate BuildRequires: perl (by perl), glib2-devel (by GConf2-devel),
pkgconfig (by GConf2-devel), gtk2-devel (by gtkspell-devel)
* some rpmlint errors that aren't blockers:
 W: xchat incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.6.6-8 1:2.6.6-8.fc7
 E: xchat tag-not-utf8 %changelog
 W: xchat non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_xchat_url_handler.schemas

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]