[Bug 819591] New: Merge Review: cvsps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Merge Review: cvsps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819591

           Summary: Merge Review: cvsps
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: unspecified
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: mluscon@xxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, hhorak@xxxxxxxxxx,
                    package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: Bug
        Regression: ---
        Mount Type: ---
     Documentation: ---


Checked git commit:
048e66bf82d60a701cc2b622f4721779c3372cfb

YES source files match upstream - cvsps-2.2b1.tar.gz
YES package meets naming 
NO package meets versioning guidelines. Pre-version should be marked as b.1
instead of b1.
YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
YES dist tag is present.
YES clean section and buildroot are present
YES license field matches the actual license
YES license is open source-compatible 
YES license text included in package
YES latest version is being packaged
YES BuildRequires are proper.
YES compiler flags are appropriate.
YES package builds in mock
YES debuginfo package looks complete.
NO rpmlint is silent - incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/cvsps-2.2/COPYING
YES final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
YES owns the directories it creates.
YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
YES no duplicates in %files.
YES scriptlets must be sane.
YES code, not content.
N/A large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
YES no headers.
YES no pkgconfig files.
YES no libtool .la droppings.
YES not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]