Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124 --- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-07 11:43:42 EDT --- Now we have: libdb4.src:274: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} libdb4.src:274: W: macro-in-comment %{__soversion_major} libdb4.src:274: W: macro-in-comment %{__soversion_major} libdb4.src:274: W: macro-in-comment %{__soversion_major} libdb4.src:274: W: macro-in-comment %{__soversion_major} libdb4.src:392: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} libdb4.src:392: W: macro-in-comment %{__soversion} There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. libdb4.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4 libdb4-cxx.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-cxx libdb4-cxx-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-cxx-devel libdb4-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-devel libdb4-devel-static.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-devel-static libdb4-java.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-java libdb4-tcl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-tcl libdb4-utils.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided db4-utils If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. libdb4-tcl-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libdb4-tcl/libdb4-tcl-libs/liblibdb4-tcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review