[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769

Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-06 21:36:13 EDT ---
$ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz 
e482932e544c847761449b106ecbc483 
/home/michael/rpmbuild/SOURCES/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz
$ wget --quiet http://code.entropywave.com/download/orc/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz -O -
| md5sum
e482932e544c847761449b106ecbc483  -

$ rpmlint SPECS/mingw-orc.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint SRPMS/mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/mingw64-orc-0.4.16-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
RPMS/noarch/mingw64-orc-compiler-0.4.16-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
mingw64-orc-compiler.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable

[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4
    to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal

The rpmlint warning about no docs can be ignored as the subpackage depends on
the main package.

Looks good. Approved!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]