Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816124 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-04 06:40:44 EDT --- Then comment 12 and comment 13 hold true. [...] A look at the built rpms also confirms the inconsistencies: $ rpmls -p libdb4-java-4.8.30-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm|grep lib64 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/libdb_java-4.8.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libdb_java-4.8_g.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libdb_java-4.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libdb_java.so Compared with your 'XXX Nuke...' comment in the spec you here include both the unversioned development-only symlink as well as the major-version-only symlink to the library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review