[Bug 225804] Merge Review: glib2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: glib2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225804





------- Additional Comments From mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-03 13:21 EST -------
> One package that needs the glib2 static library is syslog-ng v2 (a sysklogd
> replacement).

I'd consider that a bug of syslog-ng. I did remove the static libraries from
glib2 during the FC6 devel cycle, and then various people came out of the woods
and admitted that they had linked to glib2 statically (some initscripts things,
and at least one pam module). That was the reason we moved glib2 to /lib, so 
that we can stop shipping 5 statically linked copies of glib in /bin. But then
Jeremy said that static glib libraries are also needed for anaconda. Since it is
much harder to avoid static linking there, the static libaries were added back.

I would be willing to move the static libraries to a -static subpackage if that
helps.

One bug relevant to this is bug 191678. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]