Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817306 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-30 15:56:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I was unsure about naming conventions, so did look at > what was available, and noticed that, at least based > on descriptions, static libraries are install in plain > -devel packages. When that's the case, that packages are violating the guidelines, as those -devel packages MUST provide a -static package in that case (and I bet they do too). If you find a package, where it's not the case, please open a bug report against that package. When having the shared library, like you suggested in the sf tracker and when the library is properly packaged like described in [1], I'll sponsor you to the packager group. Your FAS account name is also pcpa, is that right? [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries and above/below it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review