Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815814 --- Comment #11 from Joe VLcek <JVLcek@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-26 17:01:24 EDT --- A couple of MUSTs I feel need to be addressed ========================================================= >From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines not ok MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. Although this rpmlint output may indicate a bug in rpmlint as I am pretty sure "it's" spell correctly however, as pointed out in Comment 6 this is clearly an indication it mayu be worth it to ask upstream to adjust there description. Please address the rpmlint warnings. % rpmlint rubygem-paranoia-1.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm rubygem-paranoia.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cluster<BLEEP> -> cluster rubygem-paranoia.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C acts_as_paranoid, without the cluster<BLEEP> rubygem-paranoia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cluster<BLEEP> -> cluster 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. not ok MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. see rpmlint output above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review