Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756445 --- Comment #11 from Juan Orti Alcaine <j.orti.alcaine@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-25 04:07:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm not comfortable with the name of the binary or the datadir directory given > the recent push for arm as a primary arch, can we use the package name instead, > or will this cause problems? I'm not sure about the implications of changing the name of the directory, also in Debian it's packaged this way without problem. For example you don't have a binary called x86_64. I would prefer staying close to upstream in the directory layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review