Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-03 08:36 EST ------- Random notes: * rpmlint output: W: bitmap-fonts invalid-license distributable W: bitmap-fonts no-url-tag W: bitmap-fonts-cjk invalid-license distributable W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-url-tag W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-documentation * It seems that the Lucida fonts are not free software. See the LU_LEGALNOTICE in the package. * As this is actually three different set of fonts, the version (0.3) is quite arbitrary. Also, at least ucs-fonts has released a newer version in 2006, while the version in bitmap-fonts is from 2003. * Release is complicated (5.1.1) for no real reason. Should be changed to integer value (6?). * BuildRoot should be changed to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * In the "cjk" subpackage summary, CJK should be spelled with capital letters. * "Prereq" should be replaced by "Requires" (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review