Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814924 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-22 15:36:19 EDT --- Fedora Review jalv 2012-04-22 $ rpmlint jalv*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Package named according to guidelines + Specfile named after package + Package license (MIT) is Fedora approved + Package license mateches license statements in sources + License file (COPYING) included as %doc + Specfile is written in readable American English + Package source matches upstream: $ md5sum jalv-1.0.0.tar.bz2 jalv-srpm/jalv-1.0.0.tar.bz2 f20f81dbb437f4e4ea10e00694f6cc4d jalv-1.0.0.tar.bz2 f20f81dbb437f4e4ea10e00694f6cc4d srpm/jalv-1.0.0.tar.bz2 - Package fails to compile due to several missing build requires: BuildRequires: python BuildRequires: suil-devel >= 0.6.0 BuildRequires: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel [ Also my rebuild of the lilv package on which this package depends failed due to missing build requires on python and python-devel ] + No locales + No shared libraries + No bundled libraries + No duplicates in %files + Package owns directories it creates + File permissions are sane + Specfile uses macros consistently + Contains code + Documentation is small - need not be in subpackage + %doc not runtime essential + No static libraries + No development files + No subpackages + No libtool archives + Package does not own others' directories + Filenames valid UTF8 Summary: Only the missing build requires, otherwise OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review