Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813433 Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-19 08:12:39 EDT --- - MIT license, (see also http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-legal-list/2012-01/msg00016.html ) - LICENSE text in %doc - upstream location is strange (dropbox) but Author apparently provided it here - package in the same group as fio test (Applications/System) - rpmlint issues can be ignored here (con fig? really? :-) - [!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. I don't this this is good idea, anyway this is packager decision. - doc can be in package itself, it is up to packager I see no other problem, package APPROVED (please request git etc now, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review