Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-15 05:36:23 EDT --- Taking for review The following lines are obsolete and can be removed: %global mingw_build_win32 1 %global mingw_build_win64 1 Please bump the BR: mingw32-filesystem and mingw64-filesystem to >= 95 The BR: pkgconfig can be removed as it's already part of the default build root in Fedora The BR: mingw32-libjpeg and mingw64-libjpeg can be changed to mingw32-libjpeg-turbo and mingw64-libjpeg-turbo as there are no mingw32-libjpeg or mingw64-libjpeg packages in Fedora any more (they are replaced by mingw-libjpeg-turbo) The BR: mingw32-orc and mingw64-orc can't be satisfied at the moment as the package mingw-orc isn't available in Fedora at the moment, so that package needs to be put up for review first The %{mingw_pkg_name} macro is currently obsolete. Please use the full package name in the places where this macro is used The Summary: %{summary} tags (in the subpackages) don't give the expected result. Please don't use the %{summary} tag The quotes used by the various arguments in the %mingw_configure aren't needed any more and can be removed. This %mingw_configure line can also be split among multiple lines to improve readability Please use the %mingw_find_lang macro instead of the %find_lang macro. This macro generates two file lists named mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-good.lang and mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-good.lang with translations for mingw32 and mingw64 packages, so don't forget to also update the %files tags Why are the files in the -static subpackages commented out? Right now the -static subpackages are empty packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review