[Bug 808195] Review Request: nml - NewGRF Meta Language compiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808195

Marcus Moeller <marcus.moeller@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Marcus Moeller <marcus.moeller@xxxxxx> 2012-04-11 06:58:22 EDT ---
rpmlint -v output:

nml.noarch: I: checking
nml.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grf -> gr, gr f
nml.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nfo -> no, info
nml.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US newgrf -> Nerf
nml.noarch: I: checking-url http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/nml (timeout 10
seconds)
nml.src: I: checking
nml.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grf -> gr, gr f
nml.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nfo -> no, info
nml.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US newgrf -> Nerf
nml.src: I: checking-url http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/nml (timeout 10
seconds)
nml.src: I: checking-url
http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/nml/releases/0.2.3/nml-0.2.3.src.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
SPECS/nml.spec: I: checking-url
http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/nml/releases/0.2.3/nml-0.2.3.src.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

OK so far.

---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    GPLv2+
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum *
    7188dcfffa6037b1a0735a1be1cc7a30  nml-0.2.3.src.tar.gz
    7188dcfffa6037b1a0735a1be1cc7a30  nml-0.2.3.src.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
    - Succesfully builds in mock.
    - Koji Scratch build available:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3979285
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
    separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
    I assume the packager has tested it.
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[+] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]