Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783825 --- Comment #27 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-09 00:46:31 EDT --- Hi Brendan, thanks for the update. Yes I would go with putting everything in one package, but... (In reply to comment #26) > OK, I've merged the two sub-packages back into the main package and manually > removed Gtk and Qt requires from the suil package. These libraries should be > required by the plugin and need not be pulled in here. I am not sure that I follow you here. From my understanding, any plugin that uses suil will need both gtk and Qt libraries installed, since the plugin will convert a gtk ui to Qt, or vice versa. What is the difference between this situation, and a library package X requiring another binary package Y? We don't typically filter out the Y requirement from the library X and expect the application Z to require both X and Y. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review