[Bug 788569] Review Request: libgda5 - Library for writing gnome database programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788569

--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar <karlthered@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-08 09:52:21 EDT ---
I checked the pkg-config modules, and it seems that providers only require the
base one, so it makes sense regrouping them with the main one.

I won't merge the *-ui-devel into the main *-devel subpackage since it would
also pull the whole UI stuff.
Debian => they don't build the UI parts, so this issue is irrelevant to them.
openSUSE => they didn't and i disagree with them here.
openSUSE also ship separately:
* GObject introspection stuff (against Fedora common practices)
* libgda-{reports,xslt} libraries which pull libxml2 and libxslt, the former is
commonly installed, the latter is a small add-on library of the former. I chose
that it was not worth the hassle to ship them separately. I might reconsider
this, if someone thinks they should.

updated spec and src.rpm:
Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/libgda5.spec
SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/libgda5-5.0.3-3.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]