Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799651 --- Comment #25 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-06 08:40:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Oh, that may explain why FE-NEEDSPONSOR was added (briefly, then removed for > some reason). I block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, after I read the historic in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=799651, and saw that first thing on this bug was block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, so I though that I made a mistake (make same block for the second time) so remove block FE-NEEDSPONSOR . I don't understood, Should I need two SPONSORS (one for review and other) ? but I have to go now ... > I'll kick the sponsor piece now. > > OK, I think you can go into pkgdb, and take the pkg yourself now, > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/smb4k > > (login, and click "take ownership" button) Thanks, I am proud to become a member of fedora packagers. I will do the rest soon. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review