[Bug 809114] Review Request: novacomd - Utility to connect to WebOS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809114

Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-04 05:53:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > - %clean section, as well as buildroot cleaning in %install and the BuildRoot
> > tag, is useless too:
> >    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
> >    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
> 
> I'll probably leave this in as I'd like to build this for EPEL-5
It's OK :)

> Novacom is a separate review (as they have separate upstreams) and is available
> at bug 809116.
I will review it too.

> I have wondered whether it would make sense to package novacomd as
> novacom-server, novacom as novacom-client and have a metapackage, novacom, that
> installs both.  What do you think?
I'd let the original names for each package, as recommended by the guidelines,
and add a Requires on novacomd in the novacom package, since the client cannot
work without the service.
If novacom and novacomd were available from the same source, I'd even package
it as a single RPM.

(In reply to comment #3)
> If you also could include icon and .desktop file for novaterm.
> 
> Something like:
> 
> 
> [Desktop Entry]
> Version=1.0
> Name=Novaterm
> Comment=Novaterm for command line access to WebOS device
> Exec=/home/pliszka/palm/novacom/novaterm
> Icon=/home/pliszka/icons/Palm_logo_2003.svg
> Terminal=true
> Type=Application
> Categories=Own;
This comment is rather relative to the novacom package. I don't think providing
a desktop file for novaterm is worthy since novacom is clearly described as a
set of command-line tools.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]