Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limburgher@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |limburgher@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 226295 depends on bug 468255, which changed state. Bug 468255 Summary: doc files are not in %doc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468255 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-03 13:53:13 EDT --- Fresh review: Good: - rpmlint checks return: php-pear.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: php-pear-1.9.4-restcache.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. Fix. php-pear.noarch: W: self-obsoletion php-pear-XML-Util <= 1.2.1 obsoletes php-pear-XML-Util = 1.2.1-5.fc18 The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones. Fix. php-pear.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/php-pear-1.9.4/LICENSE-Structures_Graph php-pear.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/pear/data/Structures_Graph/LICENSE The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. Trivial fix. Same hidden, zerolength and config-not-noreplace as above, still ok. php-pear.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pear/XML_Util/examples/example.php The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). Fix. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( BSD and PHP and LGPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file This is really pretty good, just the self-obsoletion, patch, license address and encoding. Let me know if you want me to commit any of these fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review