Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807472 --- Comment #4 from Tony Asleson <tasleson@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-29 19:10:35 EDT --- Thank you for the review Michael! > Correct. You also need it behind %{python_sitelib} for exactly the reason > you've given. Done >> Summary: A library for storage array management > > The majority of package summaries omit leading articles, which makes them much > more pretty when displayed in in Anaconda (and package tools). Done >> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Done >> %post >> /sbin/ldconfig > > Just want to point out, this means that there is no automatic dependency on > /sbin/ldconfig. Are you suggesting I make an explicit dependency for this? >> %files devel >> %defattr(-,root,root,-) >> %doc README COPYING.LIB > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing Done Spec file updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review