Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for manipulating config files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223588 ------- Additional Comments From matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-01 13:38 EST ------- Once again, thank you for your review. I have disabled building the static library. I also removed the corresponding %{_libdir}/*.a from the relevant %files section. I removed the commented out duplicate %configure (thank you for the information regarding rpm expansion of comments) I fixed the typo that was found in the comment section. I addressed the same typo in the the ChangeLog file. As per your advice, I have switched to using the bz2'ed tarball instead of the gzip'ed ones. (thanks for that advice) I have increased the release number from 1 to 2. I apologize in advance if my assumption to bump that number was wrong. I have added comments reflecting the major changes for this release in NEWS, ChangeLog, and the specfile. The URLs for the updated files are: Spec URL: http://www.rudeserver.com/config/download/rudeconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rudeserver.com/config/download/rudeconfig-5.0.4-2.src.rpm I am in the process of making version 5.0.4 "visibly" available on the website. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review