Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783071 --- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> 2012-03-19 05:37:12 EDT --- $ rpmlint diet-2.8.0-3.fc17.i686.rpm diet.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware -> middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight diet.i686: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libDIET_admin.so.2.8.0 diet.i686: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libDIET_client.so.2.8.0 diet.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libDIET_client.so.2.8.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 diet.i686: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libDIET_Dagda.so.2.8.0 diet.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libDIET_Dagda.so.2.8.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 diet.i686: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libDIET_SeD.so.2.8.0 diet.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libDIET_SeD.so.2.8.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0 diet.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/diet-2.8.0/LICENSE.txt diet.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dietObjects 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 6 warnings. rpmlint seems to be rather unhappy The file-not-UTF8 is IMHO not that important, but nice to fix. The shlib-with-non-pic-code , according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#shlib-with-non-pic-code is a no-go, since this can cause issue with selinux. The shlib-calls-exit is something to be brought upstream. The lack of manpages for dietObjects too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review