Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803601 --- Comment #3 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-15 09:13:41 EDT --- > You should correct the error on non standard exec. perm. Ah, this is actually a matter of filtering the provide [1] of the .so file. Done. If you're not > supporting EL5, you should remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from build section. > Yep, forgot about that. Done. > > You should use something like the following at files-section: > %{python_sitelib}/http_parser > %{python_sitearch}/http_parser > %{python_sitearch}/http_parser-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info Actually, the problem here was, that the files in "data_files" in setup.py were placed under sitelib, not under sitearch. Therefore, on 32 bit architecture, where these two are the same, the files were listed twice. The data files should usually be placed alongside the others, but the upstream does a lot of tinkering with the setup, so I just specified the location explicitly. And everything should be ok now. Here is the updated stuff: SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/http-parser/python-http-parser.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/http-parser/python-http-parser-0.7.5-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3897103 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review