Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802161 --- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz <ktietz@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-14 17:33:36 EDT --- [ktietz@nike fd_mingw]$ rpmlint mingw-w64-tools.spec -i (none): E: no installed packages by name -i 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ktietz@nike fd_mingw]$ rpmlint mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.2.trunk.20120124.fc16.src.rpm mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) toolchain -> tool chain, tool-chain, touchline mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolchain -> tool chain, tool-chain, touchline mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gendef -> gender, gen def, gen-def mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US genidl -> genial mingw-w64-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widl -> wild, wide, will mingw-w64-tools.src: W: file-size-mismatch mingw-w64-src_20120124.tar.bz2 = 104449518, http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchain%20sources/Automated%20Builds/mingw-w64-src_20120124.tar.bz2 = 33334 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Not sure here about those spelling-errors. They look bogus to me, but the archive-file-size difference looks to me a bit more concerning. Also, wouldn't it be better to prefix gendef/genidl by mingw-w64- prefix (as done for widl), too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review