Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930 --- Comment #19 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-11 12:40:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I will not do this at this point in time at least, I think it would complicate > the packaging greatly, and make updating it a chore (content changing -> new > packages). > I mean, in that case I would package two images on one package, a sound file in > another, one map in one package and the rest in another package, if going just > based on licensing... > not feasible then > > > > You should also uncomment the requires and remove the bundled enet. Write your > > spec as if the enet you require is available (looks like someone will be > > looking at this soon). if you have already an enet spec patch please attach it > > to the blocker if you haven't already > > Ok, done > > I do have a spec patch: > -Version: 1.2.1 > -Release: 3%{?dist} > +Version: 1.3.3 > +Release: 1%{?dist} > I figured it was not worth attaching. > > spec URL: http://arand.fedorapeople.org/7/redeclipse.spec ha ha - I see your point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review