Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737293 --- Comment #5 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-09 02:25:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > I took the freedom to create some new SRPM/SPEC to make some progress. > > SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django.spec > SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django-1.3.1-5.fc16.src.rpm > > Dear django-maintainers: If you're short in time, I'll be glad to help out. > Question is: how? > > Matthias - As proposed in the fpc ticket [1], we should also have Provides: django = %{version}-%{release} (with the lowercase d) for better usability via yum. - I would still love to see some unit tests running in the check section. Is there a way to do that? - Otherwise the package looks good. I agree with Matthias, that there would be lots of people willing to help with maintenance of Django. Michel, would you possibly let Matthias finish the review and then make the SCM request yourself, accepting Matthias as comaintainer (personally, I would also love to comaintain :))? This is really blocking the whole "Django rename" effort [2], so it would be nice if we could get it moving. Thank you very much! [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/146 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Django_rename -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review