[Bug 798715] Review Request: Luminance HDR - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715

--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-06 12:52:39 EST ---

rpmlint: ok
$ rpmlint luminance-hdr
luminance-hdr.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
luminance-hdr.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary luminance-hdr
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Naming:  not ok
1. since this is successor of qtpfsgui and replaces it, MUST follow
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
and contain (something like):
Obsoletes: qtpfsgui < 2.2.0
Provides:  qtpfsgui = %{version}-%{release}
for upgrade path

2. Sources: MUST.  md5sum does not match.
in src.rpm:
bd2d3782257cf502517e79852fff40be  luminance-hdr-2.2.0.tar.bz2
fetched from sourceforge:
15caab0747cc5d5f1a3a496752b733d4  luminance-hdr-2.2.0.tar.bz2

3.  scriptlets.  MUST update icon scriptlets to match,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache

4.  .desktop file.  MUST not use --vendor=fedora, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage

Licensing: Ok.  got mostly GPLv2+, with some BSD, LGPLv2+.  combined work is
GPLv2+



Address items 1-4, and we're looking good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]