Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #52 from xning@xxxxxxxxxx 2012-03-05 23:49:00 EST --- Update LSB to 4.1 for x86 and x86_64. if we use package names or provides instead of library .so names, I think we will get nearly the same dependencies for different architectures. This is true for x86 and x86 _64. LSB is packaged into different subpackages, nearly one submodule, one subpackage, except Graphics submodules and Qt submodules. LSB 4.1 requires perl module 'Locale::Constants'. But now, we only supplied 'Locale::Codes::Constants', so I supply a simple solution to this problem. Detailed information pls reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736822 http://search.cpan.org/~sbeck/Locale-Codes-3.20/ LSB 4.1 requires perl module 'Pod::Plainer', I package this module. Pls reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799284 I also package LSB dist test manager, so we can simply install this software and its dependencies. Pls reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798595 I also supplied two little perl script to translate library .so name to package name. These tools use yum repo database. All files are in the following srpm package. SPEC url: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64704553/redhat-lsb.spec SRPM url: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64704553/redhat-lsb-4.1-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review