Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798738 --- Comment #9 from pjp <pj.pandit@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-04 09:21:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > Are you a member of the packaging group? Have you been sponsored? Yes, I am. > Please document what patch0 does. And be sure to run rpmlint on your rpms, at > least the summary does not adhere to Fedora standards. Please see: SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/mysqlenum.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/mysqlenum-0.3-4.fc16.src.rpm $ rpmlint SPECS/mysqlenum.spec SPECS/mysqlenum.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: mysqlenum-0.3.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/mysqlenum-0.3-4.fc16.x86_64.rpm mysqlenum.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mysqlenum 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/mysqlenum-0.3-4.fc16.src.rpm mysqlenum.src: W: invalid-url Source0: mysqlenum-0.3.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review