[Bug 789386] Review Request: lilv - An LV2 Resource Description Framework Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789386

--- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-28 22:04:17 EST ---
Thank you for the update. Here is the rest of the review:

* Missing BR: swig

! BR: python is redundant. Does no harm though.

* BR: boost-devel and glib2-devel are redundant. It would be good to remove
them so that we don't have to drag in unrelated packages during a build.

? Could you backport the fixes from the trunk and run the tests?

* I am not sure we need to divide the Python modules in two subpackages. At the
very least the noarch package should require the arch specific one, since
lilv.py has
   import _lilv
referring to _lilv.so. Can _lilv.so be used without lilv.py? If not, they
should probably go to the same package (feel free to disagree :)).

- rpmlint says:
   lilv.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/lilv
   lilv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lilv-bench
   python-lilv.noarch: W: no-documentation
These can be ignored.

* /usr/share/man/man3/* should go to the devel package as this is development
documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]