[Bug 797694] Review Request: Farstream - Libraries for videoconferencing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797694

Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |notting@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-28 14:00:57 EST ---
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.  - OK
- License - LGPLv2+
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - OK
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK
1b10c6f735f05b5c6f77753036daa3940de8284b  farstream-0.1.1.tar.gz

- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - OK (it builds, at least)
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - OK
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - OK
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - OK
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - OK
- .so files in -devel subpackage. - OK
- -devel package Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} - ***

Need %{?_isa} appended.

- .la files are removed. - OK

- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - tested x86_64 OK
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output.

farstream.src:23: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line
23)
farstream-python.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/farstream.so farstream.so()(64bit)
farstream-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Fixing the first (mixed spaces & tabs) is nice. The others are ignoreable.

- final provides and requires are sane - OK, looks good.

SHOULD Items:

- Should build in mock. - tested x86_64 on F16
- Should function as described. - didn't test
- Should have sane scriptlets. - OK
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. -
see above
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK

Issues:

1. spec has:
  --with-package-origin='http://download.fedora.redhat.com/fedora'      \
You want download.fedoraproject.org. d.f.r.c is no more.
2. Need %{?_isa} appended to %{name} in -devel package requirements 
3. Spaces & tabs mixed in the spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]