Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796824 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-24 11:36:37 EST --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: memchan.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/memchan/Memchan2.3.tar.gz <urlopen error timed out> The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. Likely an artifact of my internet connection. Verify but probably fine. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/memchan.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/memchan.n.gz 17: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/zero.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/zero.n.gz 17: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/fifo.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/fifo.n.gz 17: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/fifo2.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/fifo2.n.gz 17: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/null.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/null.n.gz 17: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/memchanapi.n.gz 7: warning: macro `BS' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. memchan.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/mann/memchanapi.n.gz 27: warning: macro `BE' not defined This man page may contain problems that can cause it not to be formatted as intended. Not seen these before, but not a blocker. memchan-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. There's just not much there, this is ok. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( MIT and Public Domain) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files XXXX post/postun ldconfig ok This is not done. Is it needed for Tcl solibs? - devel requires base package n-v-r Otherwise, nothing out of order, as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review