Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787510 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-24 04:02:13 EST --- Re: comment 5 First of all, no strong objections with regard to using the term "library" in a generic way. Similar to the term "archive", which is not limited to tar/tgz/zip/… file types. It's okay to write "GLM is a C++ library ...", although it is just a collection of header files. I didn't object to doing that. That's an _is a_ relation, whereas a _contains_ relation is more complicated: The spec file said: "... package contains libraries and header files", which is plural (=> "library files and header files"), which was duplicate and very ambiguous as the package contains only header files. There's a description at the web page, which also explains the "GLM" acronym, btw: | OpenGL Mathematics (GLM) is a header only C++ mathematics library | for graphics software based on the OpenGL Shading Language (GLSL) | specification. Re: comment 6 Current rpmlint was only included for completeness, making it explicit which two files are affected. It could be that other builds would end up with a different set of empty files, for exaple. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review