[Bug 673790] Rename Request: mingw32-w32api -> mingw-headers - Win32/Win64 header files and stubs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790

--- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-23 19:01:20 EST ---
Thank you for reviewing this package!

New Spec URL:
http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-headers/mingw-headers.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-cross/src/mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.2.trunk.20120120.fc18_cross.src.rpm

* Fri Feb 24 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -
2.0.999-0.3.trunk.20120120
- Use smaller SourceForge source URLs
- Dropped the mingw_pkg_name global
- Dropped the quotes in the mingw_configure and mingw_make_install calls
- Improved summary of the various packages

Your improved version of the mingw_configure macro has been imported in the
mingw-filesystem package so the quotes in various RPM macro calls can now be
dropped.

I don't have a strong opinion on any of those summaries. If you want to have a
generic summary which is used by all mingw packages in Fedora then I guess it's
better to discuss this on the fedora-mingw mailing list first.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]