Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 --- Comment #22 from Michael Friedrich <michael.friedrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-23 11:58:44 EST --- not as a packager - i'd love to see someone (you? :) )actually catching up with this (as i said already on twitter - @dnsmichi). for what it's worth, i've got a ping by someone revamping the spec file a bit - from here and from upstream, so maybe we can merge that discussion. should i put you on cc and summarize offlist? current discussion is being done in german only. thing is, for the discussion above my final proposal to name the idoutils package like this: * icinga-idoutils-libdbi-mysql or -pgsql for the libdbi db layer => needs ./configure --enable-idoutils * icinga-idoutils-oracle (will never happen as it requires oracle rpms) => needs ./configure --enable-idoutils --enable-oracle * icinga-idoutils-pgsql (will happen in 2012 based on libpq) => needs ./configure --enable-idoutils --enable-pgsql libdbi does not scale well. it's not threadsafe, does not support parameter bindings, and can get deprecated if it gets worse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review