Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783825 --- Comment #12 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-21 17:57:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > The author expresses a few specific wishes in PACKAGING. What do you think > about them? Do they make sense for Fedora? You are quite right. Quoted from PACKAGING " The purpose of Suil is to abstract plugin UI toolkits away from host code. To achieve this, Suil performs its magic by dynamically loading modules for each toolkit. The main Suil library does NOT depend on any toolkit libraries, and thus neither should your package. Please package the individual modules (e.g. libsuil_gtk2_in_qt4.so) as separate packages, which themselves depend on the involved toolkits. These packages should also be versioned as described above to support parallel installation. " So, my question is should I provide suil-qt-devel and suil-gtk-devel subpackages from this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review