Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794715 --- Comment #2 from Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-17 08:01:18 EST --- I understand your point. One alternative here would be to take a subversion revision from apache.org after they updated the license. I've already investigated this possibility. I found a revision in the ASF repo from May where the license has been updated to ASL 2.0 and all of the packages have been moved into the org.apache.commons namespace. They had already updated the version to "4.0-SNAPSHOT" at that point, but the code is essentially ognl-3.0.2. I'm happy to package this instead, as it would simplify the legal situation. I'm not interested in make spot / Fedora Legal review a license for a dead company. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review