Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789759 Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr | |oject.org, | |kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-12 16:08:59 EST --- Fedora review of mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-1.fc16.src.rpm 2012-02-12 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base \ mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo-0.10.35-1.fc17.noarch.rpm \ mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-1.fc17.src.rpm mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35/COPYING mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base. mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:114: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:114: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:115: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:115: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{_mingw32_libdir} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{majorminor} mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base.src:8: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 8) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 7 warnings. Should be easy to get rid of the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning, but the rest is mostly just noise. To reduce the macro-in-comment rpmlint spew, I think I'd personally just remove the commented out lines in %files section (easy enough to add them back when needed), but it's fine the way it currently is as well. + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 1d300983525f4f09030eb3ba47cb04b0 gst-plugins-base-0.10.35.tar.bz2 1d300983525f4f09030eb3ba47cb04b0 Download/gst-plugins-base-0.10.35.tar.bz2 + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable ! Package owns all directories it creates The package creates %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/ directory, but doesn't own it. One way to fix it would be to add: %dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor} to %files. + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane, except for the directory mentioned above + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Summary ------- Please fix the %{_mingw32_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/ directory ownership issue and take a look if it's possible to get rid of some of the rpmlint warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review