Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735225 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-10 15:28:08 EST --- Okay, so I'm not sure why I originally said the rpmlint errors like this were safe to ignore: axis2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libaxutil.so axis2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libguththila.so axis2c.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libaxis2_axiom.so The unversioned .so files that are simply symlinks to the versioned lib belong in -devel, which appears to be all of them. I'm not sure about the httpd/modules/libmod_axis2.so, the schema there seems to imply that versioned .so files are not being found or used by httpd, so in that specific sort of scenario, the unversioned .so file is probably fine to stay in the main package, but everything in %{_libdir} needs to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review