Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 --- Comment #16 from nicolas.vieville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2012-02-08 14:34:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) > Thanks for the new spec, just as a reminder as I point out in comment #5, you > only need to provide one spec file/SRPM pair of links for the package to build > on rawhide/f17. This is especially true in this case because the f16 and f17 > spec are identical, putting in separate packages for f16 as well just makes it > confusing to reviewers. Noted! Next time I'll do it this way. > Dan: would you be able to continue your (unofficial) review? I'll see if I can > track down a sponsor. It would be great! Thanks in advance. > Nicolas: the fastest way to get a sponsor (I am not a sponsor myself) is to do > some additional unofficial reviews yourself and generally get to know other > package maintainers outside the context of this particular package. Thank you for these precious informations, I wasn't aware of. I'll try to know other package maintainers outside this context. But in a matter of reviewing, as a new comer in packaging (little experience in rpmfusion repository) I would not induce other packagers in error by an inappropriate or limited knowledge of the matter. I haven't integrated all the rules yet myself, and more important what are good ways to solve packaging problems and make appropriate suggestions. I'll try later when my skills in this area will be better or maybe are there any packages easy to examine. Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review