Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788216 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-08 11:05:16 EST --- I'll be building this package in EPEL-5 as well as Fedora so I'd like to keep the optional pieces (buildroot, rm of buildroot, clean, defattr). When the license file is not provided by upstream, it's up to the maintainer whether to include it (we wouldn't want to get into a position where someone feels the Fedora package maintainer is trying to relicense the code). In this case, the license seems to match up with the license information in all the sources so I am comfortable including a copy from upstream's revision control system. Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-elixir.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-elixir-0.7.1-8.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review