Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371 --- Comment #21 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-07 05:07:49 EST --- You forgot to increment the release tag when submitting spec + srpm. Please increment it each time you submit a new version, like in last free-solid.spec. You have a lot of errors and warnings. We need to apply a number of fixes to get it easier. - It seems that your spec file is not valid utf. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#file-not-utf8 - You seem to have network issues. Is possible for you to run rpmlint with a working internet connection? - Description line(s) are too long. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#description-line-too-long - You have a lot of unstripped-binary-or-object, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unstripped-binary-or-object - You need to be more careful when writing the changelog, and run rpmlint before submitting to avoid incoherent-version-in-changelog (the changelog entry should match %version-%release) - Fix the non-conffile-in-etc warning, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#non-conffile-in-etc You also have some things to talk with upstream about: - speed-dreams.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib/libtgfclient.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 - speed-dreams.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib/libtgf.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 - I think I can provide you a patch for the incorrect-fsf-address, to send to upstream. An updated COPYING is at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt - A lot of empty readme.txt, ask what to do (remove in distribution?). - The missing manpage warnings. This is not a blocker for Fedora, but for Debian/Ubuntu. So some simple manpages might help. - Multiple invalid-soname errors. See e. g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=176617. In general, it seems like a bad idea to have non-versioned names, but it might possibly be acceptable if the libraries are outside of ld.so's search path (?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review