Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784958 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-06 21:07:56 EST --- "The images, css and html is dual licensed under the BSD and AFL license." "BSD" is quite vague without the exact license text… Is there nothing more explicit? > The fading javascript is not covered in this license. The code is fadomatic and > is covered under its own license as set by its author. If it's the same as this: https://github.com/phl/Fadomatic/blob/master/fadomatic.js that's MIT. The License tag should apparently be: License: GPLv2+ and (BSD or AFL) and MIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review