Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787878 Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr | |oject.org, | |kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-06 19:21:17 EST --- I believe it would be better to name the source package mingw-icu, like in the example spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Example_Specfile We are likely to get 64 bit MinGW cross compiler in the future, and naming the source package mingw-icu would help with the transition. That way we'll be able to produce mingw32-icu + mingw64-icu binary packages from a single mingw-icu source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review