Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670915 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Elwell <andrew.elwell@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-01 06:48:01 EST --- OK - with the gcc-4.7 cleanup I had to explicitly #include <unistd.h> in serialport.cpp -- patch submitted upstream to author, together with discussions on logrotate etc (I have a logrotate.d/aprsg ready to go, but haven't included it in this as it doesn't log by default). Files available at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/aprsg-1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/aprsg.logrotate http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/aprsg.spec RPMlint output: [aelwell@pcitgtelwell aprsg]$ rpmlint aprsg.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [aelwell@pcitgtelwell aprsg]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/aprsg-1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm aprsg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US soundmodem -> sound modem, sound-modem, soundness 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (False positive - soundmodem is the name of the package) On a built binary (mock, F16-x86_64) I also get wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding for COPYING -- Text is identical to the GPL -- Should I fix with dos2unix or get upstream to change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review