Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785767 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-30 10:19:36 EST --- I did a F17 scratch build on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3746153 There are the following rpmlint errors to be expected $ rpmlint perl-Gnome2-Vte-0.09-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm perl-Gnome2-Vte.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gnome2/Vte/Install/vte2perl-version.h perl-Gnome2-Vte.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gnome2/Vte/Install/vte2perl.h perl-Gnome2-Vte.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/perl-Gnome2-Vte-0.09/LICENSE perl-Gnome2-Vte.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gnome2/Vte/Install/vte2perl-autogen.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. For the FSF address problem I filed upstream bug https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=74533 As per the Perl packaging guidelines the devel file warnings should be ignored https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#.h_files_in_module_packages $ rpmlint perl-Gnome2-Vte-0.09-1.fc16.src.rpm perl-Gnome2-Vte.src:24: W: comparison-operator-in-deptoken font(:lang=en) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This warning is to be expected, when following the Perl packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#Tests_require_X11_server The Patch1 file has an upstream bug report too https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=74532 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review